🔗 Share this article

The number of reserved seats for Indigenous council members on NZ local authorities will be slashed by over 50%, after a divisive law change that required local governments to put the fate of hard-earned Indigenous wards to a popular referendum.

Historical Context on Indigenous Representation

Māori wards, which may have one or more elected officials based on demographic data, were established in 2001 to provide Māori electors the option to vote for a assured Indigenous council member in municipal and provincial governments. Initially, councils could only establish a Māori ward by initially submitting it to a public vote in their region. Communities frequently spent years generating community backing and urging their councils to create Indigenous representation.

Policy Changes and Government Actions

To remedy the issue, the previous Labour government permitted local councils to establish a Māori ward without first requiring them to subject it to a public vote.

But in 2024, the current administration reversed the change, saying communities ought to determine whether to introduce Indigenous representation.

Voting Outcomes

The new legislation mandated local authorities that had established a ward under the previous policy to hold binding referendums concurrently with the municipal polls, which concluded on October 11. Out of 42 local governments participating in the referendum, 17 voted to keep their wards, and 25 to abolish theirs – revealing numerous areas opposed to reserved Indigenous seats.

The results represented “a crucial move in restoring local democratic control.”

Opposition parties nevertheless have criticised the government’s law change as “discriminatory” and “anti-Māori”. After assuming power, the current administration has ushered in sweeping rollbacks to policies intended to improve Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. Officials has said it wants to terminate “race-based” approaches, and asserts it is committed to improving outcomes for Indigenous people and every citizen.

Urban-Rural Divide

The results of the public votes were divided down urban-rural lines – most urban centers mandated to hold referendums backed Indigenous seats, while countryside areas skewed heavily towards removing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Māori wards that had recently been established – they’re only just starting to find their footing.”

Electoral Participation and Concerns

This year’s municipal polls recorded the lowest voter turnout in over three decades, with less than a third of citizens casting a vote, leading to demands for reform.

This approach had been “a farce”.

Comparative Treatment

Councils are permitted to establish different wards – such as countryside seats – without first requiring a community ballot. The different conditions applied to Indigenous representation indicated the administration was targeting Māori representation.

“Well, they failed. Numerous localities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This statement referred to the 17 regions that voted to keep their seats.